Airy's Failure x Sagnac Understanding Proves no Spin to the Lord Steven Christ's Concave Earth

"debate" with F.T.F.E. and Team "Skeptic". just because big sis gets angry doesn't mean she doesn't love you.
you can't make a sword out of an olive branch. so i really didn't do this to fight with people, didnt want to fight, i came with the intention of teaching or atleast preconditioning to judgement but this is what happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable incorrigible rock. I could've been cheeky and not given anyone an excuse to call me mentally ill for getting worked up but i wanted to focus on my points and he kept wanting to derail. Team Skeptic's constant interruptions, MUTING, verbal abuse and baiting provoked me to become angry. I am not
today I learned there are people who would love to have me locked up alone for being mentally ill claiming im a danger just because they can't handle losing in a debate and just because i'm passionate. literally 400+ comments on the original video saying im mentally ill just because they themselves are insecure.
this is why i get increasingly angry in this video :3 hehe, and also why you're a coward for coming up with excuses to ignore these simple polarizing arguments. ultimatley i want to preserve your life. i dont want to harm any of you, using a bit of fear of losing me is literally what im alotted to do. as in im offering you myself literally. as a messenger for my king. god in the flesh.. team skeptic was acting like he didnt know how to debate me honestly. he was saying stuff without considering what i had already said and without taking it in consideration. they would try to quickly move on from an important polarizing argument i was making so the only way to emphasize my point is to yell it. you know exactly why.
this is what happens when you are invited onto a show for the sake of entertainment ridicule and them trying to affirm something they think is already true to their audience. not actually learn, all the people in the comments can say thats what i was doing but its hypocritical to assume they werent doing the same thing. they only wanted to try and phrase what i was saying back to me in ways that would give them an excuse to not care. i was very calm in the first 20 minutes. TS being totally incorrigable about my explanation of airys failure without trying to find any middle ground of course is going to piss me off. made me realize i wasn't gonna get anywhere with them so i decided to perform for my own video.

Im here to show the difference between outer space and inner space.
Isaiah 25:7
“And he will destroy in this mountain the face of the covering cast over all people, and the vail that is spread over all nations.”

di·e·lec·tric
/ˌdīəˈlektrik/
adjective

1.
having the property of transmitting electric force without conduction; insulating.
noun

1.
a medium or substance that transmits electric force without conduction; an insulator.

you need a literal hard barrier to the sky to have the interconnectivity/propagation of low ran gps and radio signal. which mirrors how you need a conduit/foundation, tranciever and reflector for energy to travel.
the electrostatic potential required for lightning,
birefringence negative refractive rainbow halos with red on the inside at zenith.
quadruple supernumerary rainbows due to lamanated glass sky.

Relativity vs ether is a false dilemna
Sagnac effect: delay to light when spinning table proves relativity. does not disprove ether. the lack of an extreme doppler made einstein postulate a special relativity seperate from the general relativity to account for the lack of detectable spin of the earth.
Same with michaelson morley. He had a slightly positive result not null result underground behind a wooden wall proving there is no spin to the earth when you allow yourself to compare that to the airys failure experiment showing there is no movement of the telescope only a movement of the stars.
airy didnt move the telescope or tilt it down an extra 5 degrees like was hypothesized would be required if the earth was spinning, and the starlight still reached the bottom, proving a stationary earth. If the telescope was moving you would have to tip it down over time if light were straight. as the experiment showed to account for the drag that is proven that general relativity explains in both sagnac and michaelson morely. the lack of a spin to the earth requires there to be an ether. but relativity itself doesnt prove or disprove an ether. it's just a trait of the medium of space and the conservation of momentum

Allais effect: pendulum goes the other way during an eclipse proving ether pressure relief reversing the polarity of the pendulum and debunking relativity and gravity. If the pendulum is really caused by the spin of the earth and not the ether. This means the coriolis is also the whirl of the ether/oscilation of inner space relieving pressure due to the heat of the tropics while also sucking cold air out of the center and deflecting it to the poles.

Earth